Another Win for College Student Religious Rights. This Time Securing Clinical Rotations!
Originally Published by: A Voice For Choice Advocacy
Christina Hildebrand has been a warrior in the health rights and medical freedom movements for the last decade. I have learned a tremendous amount from her advocacy, and I have supported her mission since I learned of her work. She has secured more exemptions than any other advocate that I know. Below is yet another one of her success stories. If you don’t already support her work, I encourage you to do so, and I thank you for your consideration. Lucia Sinatra, Co-founder, NCM
In most colleges and universities across the U.S., students can submit religious or personal belief exemptions when vaccines are required. But when it comes to clinical rotations for healthcare-related programs, that freedom is often challenged. Universities frequently claim that hospitals will not accept students who are not fully vaccinated, citing rigid placement requirements—but the truth is, AVFCA is seeing breakthroughs, and students can and do get placed without compromising their sincerely held religious beliefs.
A Voice for Choice Advocacy is thrilled to share another victory - a case that was referred to us by No College Mandates, an organization working tirelessly to support student rights across the country. Julianna, an incoming student in a Doctorate of Physical Therapy program at an accredited university in the Upper Midwest, was thrilled to begin her education. With deeply held religious beliefs, she submitted a non-medical and medical exemption as part of her admissions process.
Despite the protections afforded under federal law, she was told that she could not remain in the program. The reason? The university claimed that their clinical partners required full vaccination and would not accept religious exemptions—placing the blame on the hospitals. The university later stated her medical exemptions were not sufficient, and they would not send them to the clinical partners.
AVFCA encouraged Julianna to contact the clinical sites directly and pursue exemption options independently. While AVFCA was able to confirm that these sites have exemption procedures in place for staff, the policies for students were unclear and inconsistently communicated. Julianna submitted her exemption request, but the clinical site needed 10 business days to process the exemption. During this time—without a confirmed placement—the university recommended she choose a different degree, claiming she could not proceed without a clinical rotation confirmation. But Julianna didn’t give up. After persistent follow-up, the clinical site ultimately approved her exemption. With that confirmation in hand, the university reinstated her to the program—though she had already lost a week of instruction due to the delay.
This case is yet another example of why you must be your own advocate. Universities and clinical programs may misrepresent policies, or simply follow outdated practices that don’t reflect legal requirements. But with determination—and support from AVFCA—you can push through. Institutions cannot lawfully accept a religious exemption for one vaccine but deny it for others. Nor can they claim exemption options exist for staff but not for students—that’s discrimination. If you’re facing similar challenges in your program, don’t take no for an answer. Know your rights.
If you or someone you know faces a similar challenge, don’t hesitate to reach out—AVFCA is here to support you. And a word to the wise: If you’re preparing to enter a university program that requires clinical placements, start this process early. Work on securing your exemption and identifying potential clinical sites well in advance. While AVFCA has found that in the end religious exemptions are accepted they sometimes take weeks to be approved, so be proactive. Julianna started this process an entire year before the start of her program. Ask for help from AVFCA early in the process to avoid delay.
Thank you for helping us make victories like this possible! AVFCA is completely funded by donations made by people like you. Your donations enable us to keep standing up for individuals facing similar challenges. Over the last 10 years, A Voice for Choice Advocacy, and our sister organization, A Voice for Choice, have been sustained only by grassroots donations, as well as my own significant donations. We are so thankful to everyone who has generously donated. However, AVFCA always needs your help to make our efforts sustainable.
If you appreciate the work we do, AVFCA asks you to donate as generously as you can - no amount is too little or too great! If you are not already, please consider becoming a monthly donor: www.avoiceforchoiceadvocacy.org/donate If you don’t want to use Stripe, here are some other ways to donate:
Send Check to: A Voice for Choice Advocacy/A Voice for Choice, 530 Showers Drive #7404, Mountain View CA 94040
Send Venmo to: @avoiceforchoice (Note: you have to search under “Business” to find us)
Send PayPal to: AVFCA – info@avoiceforchoiceadvocacy.org or AVFC – info@avoiceforchoice.org
Send Zelle to: AVFCA – info@avoiceforchoiceadvocacy.org or AVFC – info@avoiceforchoice.org
Donate your used vehicle in a hassle free way, while getting a tax deductible receipt for your donation. CLICK HERE
Donate stock through Stock Donator, which processes stock donations for non profits. A Voice for Choice will receive your donation and you will not have to pay capital gains tax on your donation. CLICK HERE
Donate cryptocurrency through Every.org, which processes cryptocurrency donations for non profits. CLICK HERE
Buy a Ticket to Our 10th Anniversary Gala Today: Join the celebration of AVFCA’s work over the past decade and support AVFCA’s work for the decade to come: https://givebutter.com/c/AVFCA2025Gala
Thank you in advance for your generosity. Together we can make change happen!
Christina Hildebrand
President/Founder
A Voice for Choice Advocacy, Inc.
christina@avoiceforchoiceadvocacy.org
www.AVoiceForChoiceAdvocacy.org




Have you noticed how everybody passes the buck to someone else? We saw this during Covid vaccine times when you would see the buck passed from your doctor to CDC to WHO to FDA to independent experts like Hotez to media talking about accepted science etc. They constantly widen the scope of the problem so that it ends up becoming a liberal vs conservative issue.
At this point, it is akin to stoning the complainer in public.
I have noticed that the ones filing the objections are then given the go around by the educated types who delight in their mental capabilities to win debates with zero downside to themselves. Meanwhile, the guy on the ground who objected is screwed over.
Why should a student who is navigating her own way for her future be beholden to a well fed official who is actually making a living out of this? Why should she need worry about legal issues when she is actually writing the checks that pay for the existence of the well fed official?
The well fed official is chopping away the branch he is sitting on -- so much for his brightness.
These kind of games are the reason we need to import desperate people from other countries who will take whatever they are asked to because life back home is really bad.
Then the Universities go to Trump and ask him to allow 600K students so that they can continue to play these games.
WooHoooo! Way to go! Love all that AVFC does for these students!