Call to Action: Email/Call these colleges today to urge them to drop all COVID vaccine mandates

Last week, I posted a call to action on our Telegram channels and on Twitter. I asked every concerned citizen to send an email to the 10 colleges/universities listed below urging them to drop all COVID vaccine mandates. Below is a letter that one of our supporters sent to the Presidents of the following ten colleges. Please take 5 minutes today to send your own email or make a phone. Time is of the essence as many of these colleges are updating their policies based on the FDA de-authorization of the primary series and authorization of the bivalent to replace of the primary series. To date, University of Michigan, Wellesley and Yale have announced they will require the bivalent booster for fall enrollment. While we are expected more college will drop all COVID vaccine mandates in the coming weeks, we can’t be sure that every one of them will. With precedent already set on bivalent booster mandates, this could go either way. Last week, I had long conversations with the health offices of a few of the colleges listed below. I can tell you that with the May 11th, the end to the federal state of emergency, quickly approaching, community feedback is very much being taken into consideration.

Also please note, we are well aware that there are many more colleges still mandating COVID vaccines. We are a very small team, and we will do our best to put up separate posts that target more colleges every few days.

1    -  Harvard University    president@harvard.edu     617-495-1585
2    -  Yale University    president@yale.edu     203-432-2550
3    -   Cal Tech    president@caltech.edu     626-395-6301
4    -   Brown University    president@brown.edu     401-863-2234
5    -  Carnegie Mellon    teoreill@andrew.cmu.edu      412-268-2200
6    -  George Washington University    bfreyre@email.gwu.edu     202-994-9240
7    -   Rutgers University    president@rutgers.edu     848-932-7454
8    -  University of Michigan    presoff@umich.edu     734-764-6270
9    -  Wellesley College    pjohnson@wellesley.edu     781-283-3347
10    -  Pasadena City College    mlcabral@pasadena.edu    626-585-7201 (the only community college out of 116 in the state of California still mandating COVID vaccines, and they are taking community feedback very seriously)
 

---

To: President, Harvard University

Dear President,

It has recently come to my attention that your school retains a COVID vaccine mandate for students. I hope you are aware that your school is now among a small handful of colleges in the US that is blindly holding onto these completely illegal, unethical and pointless vaccine requirements. 

I am a teacher and advisor to dozens of students in an affluent area of Westchester County, New York. 

Please recognize that as long as you maintain your indefensible COVID vaccine mandate, I will do everything in my power to discourage or prevent students from considering or applying to your school. 

In addition, I will spread the word via every means I have, including social media, flyers and local public meetings that Harvard University is deliberately endangering the health and lives of applicants and students, by maintaining a completely illegal, anti-scientific and misguided policy that requires an EUA vaccine - one which has caused devastating harm to people of all ages.

It may well come to light that your school is funded and controlled by Big Pharma and therefore you are prioritizing your relationship with these pharmaceutical cartels over the health and well being of your students. If this turns out to the the case, now is a good time for you to consider the the legal ramifications of your actions – for yourself, and any administrative staff that facilitated the system of discrimination upon applicants and students to Harvard University.

It is difficult to imagine that you and your staff are still unaware of the controversy surrounding the supposed ‘pandemic’ and the illegality of the vaccine mandates, as well as other facets like masks and testing. 

It’s hard to believe that your legal department and advisors allow you to carry on with these mandates considering the sheer quantity of international, national and local laws that are being broken (a sample list is provided below).

Organizations such as No College Mandates are carefully tracking US colleges and millions of students are paying attention and using their tools to make a decision about colleges to apply to. Why would any sensible young adult risk compromising their health and life simply to attend your college while there are so many other colleges without mandates? 

Please visit No College Mandates to learn more about this large scale movement and how it may affect your school.

Govern Yourself Accordingly,

Thank You,

[Name Redacted]

CC: No College Mandates

---

Sample List of Laws being Broken By Harvard University: 

International Laws

Nuremberg Code (1947) 

https://research.unc.edu/human-research-ethics/resources/ccm3_019064/

The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved, as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. 

Code 6 also states: The risks should never exceed the benefits 

The UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights

https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000212116

According to Article 6 of the Unesco 2005 statement on Bioethics and Human Rights. 

Article 6, section 1: Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be expressed and may be withdrawn by the person concerned and at any time and for any reason WITHOUT DISADVANTAGE or prejudice. (caps mine) 

Article 6, section 3: In no case should a collective community agreement or the consent of a community leader or other authority substitute for an individual's informed consent. 

Federal Laws

Title 42 1983. 42 U.S. Code § 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1983

Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.

(R.S. § 1979; Pub. L. 96–170, § 1, Dec. 29, 1979, 93 Stat. 1284; Pub. L. 104–317, title III, § 309(c), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3853.)

18 USC 241  Conspiracy Against Rights

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/241

If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

18 USC 242 – Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law

https://www.justice.gov/crt/deprivation-rights-under-color-law

Commentary:

Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. For the purpose of Section 242, acts under “color of law” include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within their lawful authority, but also acts done beyond the bounds of that official’s lawful authority, if the acts are done while the official is purporting to or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. Persons acting under color of law within the meaning of this statute include police officers, prisons guards and other law enforcement officials, as well as judges, care providers in public health facilities, and others who are acting as public officials. It is not necessary that the crime be motivated by animus toward the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin of the victim. The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term, or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any.

Federal law Title 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(I-III):

Authorization for Medical products for Use in Emergencies

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/21/360bbb-3

No Emergency Use Authorized medical devices can be mandated, this includes, but is not limited to, all COVID-19 shots, all masks and other forms of face covering, and PCR testing. Instead, the option to accept or refuse all products is required.

“Federal law Title 21 U.S.C. Section 360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(I-III) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act: Individuals to whom the product is administered are informed-(III) Have the option to accept or refuse administration of the product.”

18 U.S. Code § 1001 - Statements or entries generally

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1001

(a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully—

(1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact;

(2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or

(3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry;

shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both. If the matter relates to an offense under chapter 109A, 109B, 110, or 117, or section 1591, then the term of imprisonment imposed under this section shall be not more than 8 years.

Section 802 Of The Usa Patriot Act

SECTION 802 OF THE USA PATRIOT ACT (Pub. L. No. 107-52) expanded the definition of terrorism to cover “domestic,” as opposed to international, terrorism. A person engages in domestic terrorism if they do an act “dangerous to human life” that is a violation of the criminal laws of a state or the United States, if the act appears to be intended to: (i) intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion.

Title IX, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act (1964)

https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11705

https://d1lexza0zk46za.cloudfront.net/history/am-docs/civil-rights-1964.pdf

Title IX, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act (1964), is labor law legislation that outlawed discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.