Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Yuri Bezmenov's avatar

Spot on. All of this censorship has roots in the 2006 Duke Lacrosse Scandal. Remember the hysteria and censorship playbook of the media, academia, and injustice system: https://yuribezmenov.substack.com/p/duke-lacrosse-scandal-nifong-msm-groupof88

Expand full comment
Steve. S's avatar

Big Pharma was the big winner. A college president has a legitimate excuse In not being medically informed. Same with the administration. So, they took what they figured was a safe guess that big pharma must have been correct in saying their vaccine was safe, and effective. After all, they were “ the experts, “ Were they not?

Had any of these folks bothered to dig a little, they could have easily uncovered articles by distinguished physicians and loads of evidence to the contrary.

They made a common mistake of making assumptions about something they knew nothing about.

And they are continuing to blunder down that path.

To continue to use language about the vaccines that are worded by the university in a way that constitutes an endorsement of these toxic shots, opens the universities to legal and financial responsibility to students and their injuries and deaths.

Why not have the top administrators sit down and listen to what they haven’t heard about the vaccines? It’s lazy, sloppy, and reckless, not to check and double check all their assumptions. They’re the ones so concerned about student safety?

The students in charge of inviting speakers to the university should sign up people to talk about risks.

I remember seeing Ralph Nader at a College in the 70s. He had a big crowd. Ran down a lot of big businesses. Great evening!

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts